Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs o1-mini

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 8.9.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and o1-mini specifications
Muse Spark 1.1o1-mini
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index49.933.7
Released2026-04-082024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3639

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Coding14971362
DeepSWE53.3%—
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
Cybench—10%
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14861333
Epoch Capabilities Index154.32135.82
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
CritPt15.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
DTBench94.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Math14771358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
ProofBench39%—
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Expert14801316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
Confabulations—18.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Vision1292—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Non-English14711289
LMArena Chinese15181314
LMArena French14941292
LMArena German14661278
LMArena Japanese14451245
LMArena Korean14591223
LMArena Russian14821283
LMArena Spanish14711302

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14571304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14631321

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-mini
LMArena Text14791317
LMArena Creative Writing14401244
LMArena Multi-Turn14841314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than o1-mini?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or o1-mini better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and o1-mini share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper