Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 58.8% for Muse Spark 1.1 and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 58.8% | 32.3% |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1497 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 15.1% | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.32 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | — |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1482 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.