Model comparison
Command A vs Laguna M.1
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 36.2 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Command A | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Laguna M.1?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.