Model comparison
DBRX vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
DBRX and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 33.7.
Side by side
| DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DBRX leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning DBRX leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math DBRX leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | DBRX | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
DBRX and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DBRX or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.