Model comparison
DBRX vs phi-3-medium 14B
DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DBRX leads 14.9 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
Side by side
| DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
Knowledge DBRX leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than phi-3-medium 14B?
DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DBRX or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.