Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.6

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.1 leads 38.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 77.7% for GLM-5.1.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.247.6
Released—2026-04-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked2041

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GLM-5.1: 48.5 (#52)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Coding14551486
SWE-bench Verified—74.2%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—43.8%
WeirdML—57.1%
ALE-Bench—887.1

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GLM-5.1: 24.8 (#106)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
APEX-Agents—40.9%
ExploitBench—18.1%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—5,634

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GLM-5.1: 38.2 (#57)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%77.7%
Thematic Generalization41.7%69.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14461472
SimpleBench—55.1%
CritPt—4.6%
Chess Puzzles—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.86

Math GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GLM-5.1: 49.0 (#48)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Math14371472
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—22.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—33.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—12.5%

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#45)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Expert14271477
GPQA Diamond—89.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GLM-5.1: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GLM-5.1: 55.2 (#34)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Non-English14361448
LMArena Chinese15121516
LMArena French14661478
LMArena German14621466
LMArena Japanese13831436
LMArena Korean14061423
LMArena Russian14461453
LMArena Spanish14731467

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GLM-5.1: 76.5 (#41)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Instruction Following14131451

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#51)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Longer Query14221467

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GLM-5.1: 67.2 (#29)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-5.1
LMArena Text14451462
LMArena Creative Writing14261454
LMArena Multi-Turn14331473
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1592

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-5.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper