Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.6 leads 39.6 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 87.2% for Kimi K2.6.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
ProviderBaiduMoonshot AI
Noometry Index41.247.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2051

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Coding14551488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%87.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14461470
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.03

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Math14371475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—25.6%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—72.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—96.1%
ProofBench—16%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Expert14271491
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Vision12481282
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English14361446
LMArena Chinese15121521
LMArena French14661471
LMArena German14621449
LMArena Japanese13831442
LMArena Korean14061428
LMArena Russian14461446
LMArena Spanish14731463

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following14131451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query14221468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Kimi K2.6
LMArena Text14451455
LMArena Creative Writing14261434
LMArena Multi-Turn14331453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Kimi K2.6 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper