Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs o3
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and o3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o3 leads 32.0 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 47.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 63 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), o3: 46.8 (#64)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |
Reasoning o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), o3: 32.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.86 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |
Math o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), o3: 50.2 (#58)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), o3: 54.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1402 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |
Multimodal o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), o3: 41.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), o3: 51.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1437 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1430 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1395 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), o3: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |
Long Context o3 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), o3: 53.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), o3: 63.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than o3?
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or o3 better for coding?
o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and o3 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.