Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 20.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 44.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1516 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1477 |
Knowledge Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1516 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1424 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1463 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1465 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.4 vs 44.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.