Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.7 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1423 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Grok 4.7: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1393 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1413 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1406 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1389 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Grok 4.7 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.