Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Magistral Medium

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 57.4% for Grok 4.7 and 39.2% for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Magistral Medium
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index46.634.8
Released2026-09-212025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K128K
Max output500K16K
Input $ / M tokens$2$2
Output $ / M tokens$6$5
Results tracked2122

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
SciCode57.4%39.2%
LMArena Coding14231319
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1636—
FrontierSWE29.5%—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
CritPt17.7%0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14091267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Math13931249
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Expert14131222

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Magistral Medium: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13921232
LMArena Chinese14761225
LMArena Russian13961224
LMArena French—1268
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1176
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Spanish—1269

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following14061254

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14161295

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Magistral Medium
LMArena Text13971255
LMArena Creative Writing13911245
LMArena Multi-Turn13891275
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Magistral Medium?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Is Grok 4.7 or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Magistral Medium share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper