Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 30.4 to 8.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1538 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1511 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1497 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1548 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Magistral Medium: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1490 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1500 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.