Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 28.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1538 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1511 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1497 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1548 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1265 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1490 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1500 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1463 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.