Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and o1 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 29.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 83.3% for o1.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Proo1
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index39.140.9
Released2025-02-052024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1452

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), o1: 46.1 (#70)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
Aider Polyglot35.6%61.7%
LiveBench Coding63.5%69.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LMArena Coding—1367
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), o1: 27.9 (#111)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
EnigmaEval0.7%5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%91.6%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%65.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06141.91
LiveBench65.1%75.7%
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1371
DTBench—74.7%
LMCA—22.3%

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), o1: 36.1 (#175)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
LiveBench Math71%80.3%
MATH Level 583.5%94.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1388
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), o1: 41.5 (#110)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
GPQA Diamond65.7%76.8%
Confabulations18.4%11.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
LMArena Expert—1361

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o1: 48.6 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
LMArena Non-English—1358
LMArena Chinese—1394
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Russian—1356
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), o1: 74.8 (#86)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%81.5%
LMArena Instruction Following—1367

Long Context o1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), o1: 50.3 (#9)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%83.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), o1: 55.6 (#144)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo1
LiveBench Language44.9%65.4%
LMArena Text—1366
LMArena Creative Writing—1348
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1369

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and o1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper