Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6V

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 38.0.
  • GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V specifications
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.541.3
Released2026-07-212025-12-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.90
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Coding14531390
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), GLM-4.6V: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Hard Prompts14411368
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), GLM-4.6V: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—
LMArena Math1433—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Expert14351371
GPQA Diamond83.3%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Vision12681164

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Non-English14271359
LMArena Chinese14691425
LMArena Russian14431340
LMArena French1451—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1427—
LMArena Korean1407—
LMArena Spanish1442—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Instruction Following14201352

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Longer Query14351358

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.6V
LMArena Text14351377
LMArena Creative Writing14201347
LMArena Multi-Turn14451360
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6V?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper