Model comparison
gpt-oss-20b vs Wizardlm 70b
gpt-oss-20b and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where gpt-oss-20b leads 42.4 to 29.8.
Side by side
| gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.018 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.09 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.1 (#185), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1081 |
| SciCode | 34.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
gpt-oss-20b: 9.2 (#146), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 18.8 (#251), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | 1079 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 68% | — |
| LMCA | 14.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.81 | — |
Math gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#93), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#186), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | — |
Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 42.4 (#192), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1269 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1311 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1249 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1279 | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1239 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | — |
Instruction Following gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 62.0 (#235), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | 1093 |
| IFEval | 73.2% | — |
Long Context gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#203), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
gpt-oss-20b: 35.8 (#260), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | — |
| WildBench | 73.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-oss-20b better than Wizardlm 70b?
gpt-oss-20b and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is gpt-oss-20b or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.