Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 36.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index41.341.3
Released—2025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding13611443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13741420
CritPt—0%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math13591396

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert13391425

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English13631392
LMArena Chinese14171462
LMArena French13911429
LMArena German13551395
LMArena Japanese13421325
LMArena Korean13511358
LMArena Russian13681387
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13441392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13661409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text13771411
LMArena Creative Writing13591375
LMArena Multi-Turn13871404

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper