Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 57.7.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1395 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1419 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1388 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1393 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1374 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.