Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 17.9.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
ProviderXiaomiNVIDIA
Noometry Index44.439.6
Released2026-09-222026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.45
Results tracked1321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding15161403
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts14811386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math14771381
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert15161397

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Nemotron 3 Super: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision1266—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English14391356
LMArena Chinese15011430
LMArena Russian14241336
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following14631347

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query14651362

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text14591378
LMArena Creative Writing14081317
LMArena Multi-Turn14601369

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Nemotron 3 Super?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper