Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.3 vs o4-mini
Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 9 categories and o4-mini in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 40.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 46.3% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 4.9% for o4-mini.
- Both cost about the same: $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens.
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.8 | 41.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1514 | 1368 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 45% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| CursorBench | 41.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1657 | — |
| SciCode | 59.7% | — |
| GSO | — | 3.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.6% |
| CadEval | — | 62% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 826.17 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.72 |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 57.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 53.2% |
| GDPval | — | 25.3% |
| GDP.pdf | 27.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26% | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1503 | 1351 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 25% | 5% |
| DTBench | 96.5% | 77.6% |
| LMCA | 53.9% | 26.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.75 | 145.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 38.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 58.7% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 9.2% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74.4% | 36.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 99.2% | 81.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1389 |
| ProofBench | 58% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 24.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1343 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 18.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 82% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 18.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 73.5% |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1309 | 1194 |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena Document | 1471 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1354 |
| LMArena French | 1524 | 1364 |
| LMArena German | 1515 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1474 | 1308 |
| LMArena Korean | 1501 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1490 | 1334 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1490 | 1347 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1321 |
| IFEval | — | 92.8% |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1488 | 1315 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1353 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1455 | 1294 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1906 | — |
| WildBench | — | 85.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than o4-mini?
Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or o4-mini?
o4-mini is cheaper. It lists at $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is Muse Spark 1.3 or o4-mini better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and o4-mini share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.